about what dinitri wrote:......
the problem is so clear.....
dimitri u said: "to be clean and democratic (u mean Jmayel) must accept him (Aoun) as a leader and follow him"
in fact it is a very dangerous sentence, it show how some people think... that way of thinking made a our people suffering...
the aounist (i prefer saying that more then saying tayyar watani 7our), think that to be honist i Must be aounist, to be democratic i must be aounist.... to be christan i must be aounist....
i will not talk specifically about aoun, but about the idea, u are with aoun u are good....
15 years passed aoun was:
1- refusing totally the idea of "moukawama" considering it milishia, under the control of syria and iran..... saying only the lebanese army must defend lebanon
2- sleiman franjieh, walid jounblat, nabih biri, and all others are not good persons but criminal and stol the country....
being a part with 14 March:
1- refusing totally the idea of "moukawama" considering it milishia, under the control of syria and iran..... saying only the lebanese army must defend lebanon. (he refused bristol meeting casue they said that the problem of the arm of hizbollah must be solved by an interior dialogue, he broke the meeting and say that we can't have dialogue about matter concerning "siyada" choufou lawen el mawdou3 m2adas "bravo
!!!)
2- refusing the "al taklif al char3i" 3ind hizbollah, and wilayat al fakih.
2- wlaid jounblat and saad al hariri (not any word against them)
being a part of 8 mars:
1- al moukawama is the best thing in lebanon,they defend lebanon, they are not militia, they have the right to do evrything (cable phones, bringing money from other countries, have arms, have rocket, taking alone any decision concerning fighting israel, have a dependent relation with any country they want, have their dependent intelligent, have the right to close any area they want.... ),
2- nabih biri, sleiman frangieh, hizb allah are all good, they do only what is for the safety of lebanon... while others are all a part of america and do only the think that america want, they are criminal, not democratic.....
i think looking to the history it's clear that who is with is aoun is good, who is against aoun is bad......
the problem i have now, how u dimitri and others accept saying the same thing....
no gmaeil have the right to refuse and to be agianst aoun, and it's not the criteria for him to be democrtatic or no....
evry person have the right not to be aoun, and still Good....
it the same theologi then hizbollah, who is not with el hizb is with israel....
so that when jmayel and jebran died:
"WAZA3OU BI2LEWA!!!!!!!!!!"
WHEN U WNAT TO TALK IN POLITICS U MUST TALK IN IDEA, STRATEGIES..... NOT IN PERSONNAL.........
IF THE STRATEGY OF 14 MARCH IS BETTER THEN 8 MARCH GO WITH 14
IF 8 S BETTER GO WITH 8.........
BUT NEVER GO WITH A PERSON, NEVER SAY WHO IS WITH THIS ONE IS GOOD AND DE3MOCRATIC AND WHO IS NOT WITH THIS PERSON IS NOT DEMOCRATIC......,
no dimitri i think it's u who don't accept other..... u must accept that a large people have the right to be with hizbollah or with 2ouwet or with mousta2bal......
with biri or Aoun......
be whatever u want to be but never say about the others "his kha2en" he is "3amil"......
this words are for the 14 and 8 march!!!
Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:37 am
